<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Bloggitation comments</title>
    <link>http://typo.onxen.info/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <ttl>40</ttl>
    <description>Bloggitation comments</description>
    <item>
      <title>"[ANN] Restolog - RESTful blog example" by Benjamin</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s nice to get  REST  examples. Blog is in my feeder now too, good updates here. &amp;#8211; ben @ http://rubyonrailsblog.com/&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Aug 2006 10:59:07 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/08/10/ann-restolog-restful-blog-example#comment-14</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/08/10/ann-restolog-restful-blog-example#comment-14</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Rails "one-click" installer for Debian Sarge" by Stoyan</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, but I&amp;#8217;m talking for &amp;#8216;stable&amp;#8217; (sarge).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 23:32:01 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/06/15/rails_on_nacl#comment-13</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/06/15/rails_on_nacl#comment-13</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Rails "one-click" installer for Debian Sarge" by Reza</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s already in debian testing &amp;#8211; unstable for several months&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 20:17:02 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/06/15/rails_on_nacl#comment-12</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/06/15/rails_on_nacl#comment-12</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Mongrel Clustering" by I just don't have much to say these days, but so it goes. Today was a total loss. I guess it doesn't bother me.</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I just don&amp;#8217;t have much to say these days, but so it goes. Today was a total loss. I guess it doesn&amp;#8217;t bother me.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu,  4 May 2006 19:03:23 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/04/24/mongrel-clustering#comment-11</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/04/24/mongrel-clustering#comment-11</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Mongrel Clustering" by I just don't have much to say recently. Such is life. I've basically been doing nothing. Basically nothing seems worth bothering with. Oh well.</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I just don&amp;#8217;t have much to say recently. Such is life. I&amp;#8217;ve basically been doing nothing. Basically nothing seems worth bothering with. Oh well.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu,  4 May 2006 00:38:11 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/04/24/mongrel-clustering#comment-10</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/04/24/mongrel-clustering#comment-10</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Mongrel Clustering" by Basically nothing seems worth thinking about. I haven't been up to much these days. I just don't have much to say right now. I can't be bothered with anything , but whatever.</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Basically nothing seems worth thinking about. I haven&amp;#8217;t been up to much these days. I just don&amp;#8217;t have much to say right now. I can&amp;#8217;t be bothered with anything , but whatever.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed,  3 May 2006 09:47:01 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/04/24/mongrel-clustering#comment-9</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/04/24/mongrel-clustering#comment-9</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"TDD? BDD?" by Dan Kubb</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ahh, I understand what you meant now.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I suppose you could try it with Rails 1.0, but it may or may not work.  I never tested the examples or libraries in the article with anything less than 1.1.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue,  2 May 2006 10:04:51 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/05/01/tdd_bdd#comment-8</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/05/01/tdd_bdd#comment-8</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"TDD? BDD?" by Stoyan Zhekov</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Dan,
thanks for the feedback. Hm, maybe i&amp;#8217;m not very clear. Think to replace the &amp;#8220;article itself is a little old&amp;#8221; with &amp;#8220;Article is better to be tryed with Rails 1.0&amp;#8221;. Is it better like that?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue,  2 May 2006 04:04:34 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/05/01/tdd_bdd#comment-7</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/05/01/tdd_bdd#comment-7</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"TDD? BDD?" by Dan Kubb</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Stoyan,&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I just wanted to get a bit more feedback from you on the  REST  on Rails article I wrote.  In what way was the article old, or were you referring to the Rails 1.1 article with that sentence?&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;p&gt;I must admit I do like the idea of routing based on the method names, but I actually tried something very similar back in November.  After several months of experimentation, I ended up moving away from it though.  That was a really hard thing to do, since I wanted to keep things aligned with &lt;strong&gt;all&lt;/strong&gt; the rails conventions.  In retrospect the one or two small changes we made resulted in much a better end result&amp;#8212;we&amp;#8217;d be loosing too much ground with the other approach.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue,  2 May 2006 03:17:45 PDT</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/05/01/tdd_bdd#comment-6</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/05/01/tdd_bdd#comment-6</link>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>"Adios FastCGI" by Stoyan Zhekov</title>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry, I&amp;#8217;m not speaking spanish. Maybe &amp;#8220;Adios&amp;#8221; is already more worldwide, than spanish word ;) Like &amp;#8220;Astra la vista, babe&amp;#8221; ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:40:32 PST</pubDate>
      <guid>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/03/15/adios-fastcgi#comment-4</guid>
      <link>http://typo.onxen.info/articles/2006/03/15/adios-fastcgi#comment-4</link>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
